Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
119
Highlights
40
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
vs
Anker 735 Nano 2:
119 Highlights & 40 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Choose UGREEN for flexible charging across devices or Anker for stable, fixed port power. Both are reliable and travel friendly.
We ran the full gadget test: UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports vs Anker 735 Nano 2 — from usb-c ports, wireless charging power, cable length & interchangeable plugs to design smarts, here’s how they compare.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 47 points higher
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 47 points higher
Compact GaN Chargers Showdown: UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports vs Anker 735 Nano 2
When it comes to portable charging, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and the Anker 735 Nano 2 stand out as two solid choices for beginners and travelers seeking efficient multi-port GaN chargers. Both offer three ports: two USB-C and one USB-A, with a maximum output power of 65W, supporting fast charging for a range of devices from smartphones to laptops. Notably, each boasts compact size and advanced GaN charging technology, making them travel-friendly essentials. Yet the differences in power distribution, weight, warranty, and energy-saving features could sway your preference depending on your needs.
Dynamic Power and Solid Build: What UGREEN Nexode Brings to the Table
The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports distinguishes itself primarily through its dynamic power distribution, which intelligently adjusts the output across all three ports during simultaneous charging. This flexibility means that if you're charging three devices at once, say, a laptop, tablet, and phone, the Nexode can allocate power to suit each device's needs efficiently. It's rated for consistent charging performance, ensuring reliability even when multi-tasking flows.
Built with a plastic housing reinforced by heat-resistant materials, it delivers a durable unit with medium scratch resistance and a decent level of drop resistance. Safety gets top billing, with multi-layer safety redundancy, fire protection, and thermal fail-safe mode all built in to guard against overheating or electrical faults.
While it carries a heavier weight of 0.75 lbs, the Nexode maintains a slightly more compact footprint in width and height, which might suit those preferring a chunkier yet neatly sized charger. However, it runs at a fixed output voltage of 5V, which could limit compatibility with higher voltage devices.
Lightweight Durability and Smarter Efficiency: The Anker 735 Nano 2 Advantage
The Anker 735 Nano 2 excels notably in portability, weighing less than half the UGREEN at just 0.31 lbs. Its slim design, with slightly higher height but similar width, makes it an excellent companion for frequent travelers who value weight savings. Featuring a tough blend of plastic and polycarbonate, the Anker is crafted for premium durability, supported by a high manufacturing quality level and a prolonged rated lifespan, allowing it to endure frequent use over time.
With a fixed power distribution, Anker's setup is somewhat simpler, which can provide steadier power allocation but less adaptability when juggling different charging loads. Still, it supports a higher peak 20V output voltage, making it a better match for power-hungry devices, including some laptops.
Safety is robust with instant protection response, complemented by the multi-layer safety redundancies and thermal fail-safe modes. Thermal endurance is superior as well, boasting a higher thermal throttling threshold at 176°C compared to the Nexode's 149°C, enabling better heat tolerance under sustained heavy use.
Energy efficiency features like energy-saving technologies further set the Anker apart, alongside a longer warranty period of 1.5 years and more diverse support channels, including live chat, enhancing post-purchase peace of mind. The price point is friendlier, too, available for approximately $39.99 at Amazon.
The Quick Take on These Chargers
UGREEN's Nexode 65W 3 Ports shines with flexible power distribution and reliable safety features, making it a great pick if adaptable charging for multiple devices is your priority. The Anker 735 Nano 2 wins on portability, build quality, and energy-saving perks, perfect for those who want a lightweight, durable, and efficient charger; ideal for travelers and power users.
Bottom Line: Which Charger Should You Choose?
For users who need a versatile and sturdy charger capable of dynamically allocating power to multiple devices simultaneously, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports is a smart option, despite its slightly heavier build and higher price. On the other hand, the Anker 735 Nano 2 delivers excellent value with its lightweight design, robust construction, higher voltage support, and longer warranty, making it the better overall choice for most people, especially travelers seeking longevity and energy efficiency in a compact package.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 735 Nano 2 - Offers better portability, superior build quality, higher voltage output, energy-saving features, and longer warranty at a more affordable price.
Runner-Up: UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports - Best if you prioritize dynamic power distribution and more compact width and height, but can handle the extra weight and expense.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We dove deep into UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports vs Anker 735 Nano 2 — every major spec, performance test, and design callout is here to help you pick the right charger.
The Product Name for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports is 'UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports' whereas for Anker 735 Nano 2 it is 'Anker 735'. This means each product is distinctly branded.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
61
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Standard Charging, Fast Charging, GaN
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
GaN
vs
Charging Technology
The Charging Technology in UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports includes Standard Charging, Fast Charging, and GaN, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 uses GaN only. UGREEN provides more varied charging technologies.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports was released in 2023 while Anker 735 Nano 2 came out in 2022, making UGREEN the newer model.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended use includes home, office, and travel, making it versatile for multiple everyday environments.
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is intended for use in home, office, and travel environments, showing versatility across common charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Plug-In
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-In
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Installation style is plug-in, requiring no additional tools or setup other than connecting to an outlet.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
88
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
AC Outlet
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Usage Environment for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports includes both Indoor and Outdoor, while Anker 735 Nano 2 is designed for Indoor use only. UGREEN offers greater versatility in usage environments.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Usage Environment,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
UGREEN is great for both indoor and outdoor use, feels versatile.
See more
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
38
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Wall Charger
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
68
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Desktop
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
78
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Global
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Global
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
58
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Compact
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 have a Maximum Output Power of 65 Watts, offering equal power capacity.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Output Power on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Input Current for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 is 1.8 Amperes, indicating similar electrical input specifications.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
1.80 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Output Voltage of UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports is 5 Volts, while Anker 735 Nano 2 outputs 20 Volts. Anker supports a higher voltage output which may be beneficial for certain devices.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
15.0 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 feature Short Circuit Protection, enhancing safety during charging.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Minimum output power is 5 Watt, sufficient for low-power devices or trickle charging.
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
The charger accepts an input voltage of 100 Volt, suitable for use in regions with this standard voltage.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
The charger operates at an input frequency of 50 Hz, which is standard in many regions globally.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.1
Watt
0Votes
0.3
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
58
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Good
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Advanced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Advanced
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Surge protection rating is advanced, providing high-level defense against voltage spikes.
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling
What peak power can it handle?
65
Watt
0Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
vs
Peak Power Handling
The Peak Power Handling is 65 Watts for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating equivalent peak power capabilities.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3.25
A
0Votes
3.25
A
0Votes
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
3.25 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
68
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Good
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
73
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Good
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports uses Dynamic Power Distribution Method while Anker 735 Nano 2 employs Fixed distribution, meaning UGREEN can allocate power more flexibly among ports.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
73 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 provide Consistent Charging Consistency, promoting reliable power delivery.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency is High for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, ensuring effective thermal control.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
65
Watt
0Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watt, supporting fast charging for multiple device types.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Stable
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Charging stability is stable, providing consistent and reliable power delivery to devices.
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
58
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Fast
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Charging speed is categorized as Fast, allowing devices to charge more quickly than standard rates.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Gradual
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 735 Nano 2
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
88
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Standby
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standby
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
The Idle Charging Behavior is Standby for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, ensuring minimal energy use when not actively charging.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
67
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
3
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
1Votes
Yes
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports allows charging of 3 devices simultaneously, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 supports simultaneous charging but does not specify number, indicating UGREEN may be clearer for multi-device use.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
67 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Simultaneous Device Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Anker's simultaneous charging is a killer feature, makes life easier.
See more
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 include 2 USB-C Ports, providing ample connectivity.
Number of USB-C output ports for modern devices.
In the battle of USB-C Ports,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Ports on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both products feature 1 USB-A Port each, allowing compatibility with older devices.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Cable Length
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports has a Cable Length of 0 feet indicating no cable, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 does not specify cable length, indicating it may vary or be absent.
Length of the included charging cable.
Based on community votes for Cable Length,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports nor Anker 735 Nano 2 have Interchangeable Plugs, so plug type is fixed for both.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
73
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Available connector types include USB-A and USB-C, offering broad compatibility with many devices.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
63
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Side
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Auto
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
28
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
3
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
3
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Height of UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports is 1.28 inches compared to 1.8 inches for Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating UGREEN is shorter and possibly more compact vertically.
The vertical measurement of the charger from bottom to top.
In the battle of Height,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 are classified as Compact for Travel Size Classification, making them portable.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
1.2
inch
0Votes
3.5
inch
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Plug profile depth measures 1.2 inch (3.05 cm), affecting how far the charger protrudes from the wall.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Plug profile depth is 3.5 inches (8.9 centimeters), which impacts how much the charger extends from the wall outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
In the battle of Plug Profile Depth,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
2.56
inch
0Votes
1.15
inch
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
The product depth is 2.56 inch (6.50 cm), reflecting a moderate size typical of multi-port wall chargers.
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
1.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance is 3 feet for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating similar shock protection levels.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
3.00 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports uses Plastic for Housing Material, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 uses Plastic and Polycarbonate, suggesting Anker may use more robust materials.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both products include Heat-Resistant Materials in their build, improving safety under higher temperatures.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance is rated Medium for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, offering moderate surface durability.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is Low for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports but Medium for Anker 735 Nano 2, making Anker a better choice for environmentally conscious users.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
88
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
V-0
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Standard
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Reinforced
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
28
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Matte
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Solid
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
None
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Redundancy Level is Multi-Layer for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, offering enhanced protection.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection is present in both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, increasing safety against fire hazards.
Built-in measures to reduce fire risk during electrical faults.
In the battle of Fire Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports nor Anker 735 Nano 2 have Child Safety Shutter, which is important for users with children.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Instant
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection Response Time is not available for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports while Anker 735 Nano 2 has an Instant response, indicating Anker may react faster to electrical faults.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 include Thermal Fail-Safe Mode, improving thermal safety.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
78
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Enhanced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Safety certification level is enhanced, meaning it meets rigorous safety standards beyond basic requirements.
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging is available on both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, making them suitable for charging laptops.
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging capability is confirmed Yes for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, ensuring compatibility with tablets.
Indicates compatibility with tablets and similar devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Universal for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, making them versatile across brands.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Backward Compatibility
Backward Compatibility is Yes for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, supporting older devices.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method is Passive for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning no active cooling is used.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Noise Level
Noise Level is 0 dB for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports but not available for Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating UGREEN may have silent operation data available.
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold is 149°F for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports versus 176°F for Anker 735 Nano 2, so Anker can handle higher temperatures before throttling.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
27.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability is Stable for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, ensuring performance under continued load.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
78
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
-4–140°F
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
58
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Thermal Pads
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Heat Sink
Anker 735 Nano 2
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
5
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
58
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
32–104°F
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Range,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
vs
Energy Loss as Heat
Energy Loss as Heat is Low for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, improving efficiency.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation is Straight for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, favoring standard plug alignment.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 are Travel Friendly, suitable for use on the go.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience is High for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, supporting comfortable regular use.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicators
Does it have LED indicators?
No
1Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
LED Indicators
LED Indicators are absent on both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, which may affect visual charging feedback.
Presence of LED lights to show charging or power status.
In the battle of LED Indicators,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Based on community votes for LED Indicators,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
UGREEN's lack of LED indicators is a bummer, I like having them.
See more
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
78
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
None
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating moderate durability in harsh conditions.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Environmental Stress Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Manufacturing Quality Level is Standard for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Premium for Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting higher build quality for Anker.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures is Medium for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and High for Anker 735 Nano 2, implying better reliability for Anker.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
98
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Stable
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Lifespan
How long is the rated lifespan?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Moderate
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Long
vs
Rated Lifespan
Rated Lifespan is Moderate for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports but Long for Anker 735 Nano 2, favoring Anker for longevity.
Expected operational lifespan of the charger under normal usage conditions.
In the battle of Rated Lifespan,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Lifespan on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
48
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating is High for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, promoting economical power use.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category is Medium for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, showing average environmental impact.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Features are absent in UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports but present in Anker 735 Nano 2, favoring Anker for energy conservation.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating is Low for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating efficient power delivery.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length is 1 Year for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports versus a longer 1.5 Years for Anker 735 Nano 2, offering extended coverage for Anker.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels include Email and Online Portal for UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports, while Anker 735 Nano 2 adds Chat to these options, giving more support avenues.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
28
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Standard Returns
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standard Returns
vs
Replacement Policy
Both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2 have Standard Returns as their Replacement Policy, offering standard post-purchase support.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
18
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports
0Votes
Business Hours
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability is during Business Hours for both UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports and Anker 735 Nano 2, restricting support to typical service times.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on UGREEN Nexode 65W 3 Ports ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
